[ad_1]
I need to be clean. I’m the exact opposite of a Leslie Stahl fangirl. Whatever the journalist in 2023 is, Leslie Stahl is the antithesis of that, she’s completely irrelevant and just ameliorating my distaste for her with the soft lens of softball 60 minutes Interview with Marjorie Taylor Greene, fascist, rebel, and risk-taker all of our lives. But sure, let’s put her on national television and make her look normal, Leslie. what could be the problem?
If you haven’t been keeping an eye on either Stahl or Greene, just to keep you up to date, Greene did a sit-down interview with Stahl on 60 Minutes on Sunday for the full prime-time treatment. is talking about walking around outside, soft focus lighting and, of course, the b-roll of Stahl asking silly questions and offering more than the lightest pushback or holding the green responsible. there isbecause it has no effect
If that sounds bad, it’s because it really is! Came in my head! So do many others.flat MSNBC Issues an editorial similar to “WTF Leslie?!”
Stahl cites some of Green’s more “controversial” views, including false claims that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump and that Democrats are “pedophiles” who support transgender rights. Stahl’s backlash against both claims, however, was negligible. The most egregious was when Stahl asked while going back and forth about Green’s use of pedophiles.
Therein lies the biggest problem with trying to profile someone like Green in the “out of nowhere” or “just a fact” framing that “60 Minutes” still utilizes. Stahl’s question makes it appear that Green’s anti-transgender advocacy is not a policy position that actively harms and endangers trans-Americans and their families, but a stance that should be taken a step back.
Well, yes, accusing someone of being a pedophile is just “swearing.” Because we are desensitized to all this right wing absurdity and it is normalized.
That op-dd continued:
If anything, Mr. Green’s rise shows that the Republican Party has not yet sought moderates in the post-Trump era and is tending to the right. The fact that Greene was able to land a major interview like this and feel good makes Stahl a complicit in the House of Representatives’ shadowy campaign to become Trump’s running mate in 2024. Right-leaning, her role in exacerbating it, and how it’s doing lasting damage to our country, and to ’60 Minutes’ viewers.
Can’t we give these ghouls a platform? Need to hear them? They systematically disenfranchise everyone they deem “others.” Why does someone like that need a prime time slot to brush off the mild accusation of being “mean”? (Which one should I choose? Show her what a woman who died of sepsis looked like after being unable to get an abortion. Tell the fascist minority in your own country our story. Why let them rule and make their messages look mild and palatable?! Why do we make national platforms fun and normalize them?
I am furious about this. Many people on social media also said:
But guys, she’s a white blonde woman! She looks good on TV! Don’t push her too hard. She may look mean. There aren’t an infinite number of mean white women screaming for the chance to make a national name for her.
Worse still, civil servants 60 minutes Twitter accounts joined the action:
Her opinion is crap and harmful to this country. what are we doing here? How did journalism fail so spectacularly? As for the woman who believes Parkland was a false flag, it’s not your job to call it “controversial”. Point it out and say, “This person is dangerous.” You don’t give her her charming treatment and act like it’s a normal thing.What’s wrong with you forever love fuck?
(Main image: CBS)
Any tips I should know? [email protected]
[ad_2]
Source link