[ad_1]
The 42-page filing goes into great detail about how Hunter Biden’s data was released. This is what propelled Hunter Biden into the turmoil of the last presidential election and, since January, at the center of a Republican-led congressional probe into the president’s son. .
The lawsuit could draw more attention to a salacious chapter in Hunter Biden’s life, one containing nude photos, sensitive audio, and a ton of personal texts and emails. Privacy rather than being part of an attempt by Biden and his lawyers to reframe the narrative, with critics saying they were traded in his father’s name and profited from his political ties. It focuses on private individuals who have been allegedly compromised.
“As a result of Mac Isaac’s illegal agreements and conspiracies with others, Mr. Biden’s personal data was made available to third parties and ultimately released to the general public. This is highly offensive. and has damaged Mr Biden and his reputation,” the lawsuit states. “The purpose of violating Mr. Biden’s privacy and disseminating his data was to harm and embarrass Mr. Biden, not for a legitimate purpose.”
The move was a response to a lawsuit filed by Mac Isaac himself last year and has been amended several times since Hunter Biden claimed he defamed him by saying he illegally accessed data. . It was dumped in his shop. The repairman lawsuit also targeted CNN, Politico, the Biden campaign, and Rep. Adam B. Schiff (California Democrat).
Hunter Biden’s decision to respond with an affirmative legal challenge as House Oversight Committee chairman Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.) prepares a high-profile investigation into the president’s son Intensifies his battle with his critics, just like in . This dynamic could prove to be an awkward distraction for President Biden, who is seeking re-election within weeks.
Hunter Biden seeks a jury trial to determine compensatory and punitive damages. is asking the court to demand the return of
This is the first lawsuit by Hunter Biden and his lawyers, and the new legal team Hunter Biden has introduced in recent months since his laptop emerged as a point of intense interest for political opponents of the president. The team has previously sent criminal referrals and cease and desist orders to various individuals, but this is the first time a lawyer has formally appeared in court. .
Still, the legal move required a delicate positioning by the president’s son, who never explicitly confirmed that the laptop belonged to him.
Hunter Biden has not admitted to dropping the laptop, receiving or failing to receive the bill in the lawsuit. In response to such allegations by Mac Isaac, the filing states: Biden doesn’t know enough to admit or deny the allegations. “
However, he does acknowledge that some of the published data is his, and Mac Isaac may have been able to obtain it in April 2019.
“This is not an acknowledgment by Biden that Mac Isaac (or anyone else) actually owned a particular laptop containing electronically stored data belonging to Biden.” said Filing. “Rather, Biden only admitted that at one point Mac Isaac obtained electronically stored data, some of which belonged to Biden.”
Hunter Biden argues that if even Mac Isaac had an unclaimed laptop, Delaware law would have restricted his ability to access or distribute that data. .
Mac Isaac and his allies have often pointed to signed receipts stating that any property not recovered after 90 days will be forfeited. But Biden’s lawyers say the deal was flawed.
According to them, the boilerplate terms were included in small print at the bottom of the page, well below the byline. Delaware law states that private property is only considered abandoned after one year of his death, and certain steps must be taken, such as posting a notice asking the owner to retrieve the property.
“And, contrary to Mac Isaac’s claim that the property left in his store was property abandoned after 90 days, he said in a recently published book and other media appearances that Mr. Biden owned as data. Long before 90 days had passed since he claimed any property or data was left at the store,” the lawsuit states.
The counterclaim also argues that even if the laptop is abandoned, it only gives Mac Isaac a right to the device, not the data stored on it.
“In fact, the Repair Authorization Form states that the Mac Shop will make every effort to ‘protect your data,'” the complaint states. “Reputable computer companies and repairers routinely remove personal data contained on replaced, misplaced, or abandoned devices. It will not be copied and given to others.”
The counterclaim also made copies of Biden’s hard drive and distributed them to many people, including his father Richard Mac Isaac, uncle Ronald J. Scott Jr., and former New York attorney Robert Costello. Quoting Mac Isaac’s statement: Mayor Rudy Giuliani. “Mr. Biden did not give any of the individuals identified in this counterclaim permission to access, copy, disseminate, post, or otherwise distribute his data, but they did not grant it.” I got the
“Mr. Biden expects more privacy than reasonable expectations for the data he creates or maintains, especially for the most personal data such as photos, videos, interactions with other adults, and communications with family members. I was. no Access, copy, distribute or post on the Internet for others to use against him or his family or for viewing by the general public. “
A lawyer for Mac Isaac did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Based on an article published by the New York Post just before the 2020 election, data allegedly coming from laptops has come under intense scrutiny. At the time, the Washington Post repeatedly asked Giuliani and Trump ally Stephen K. Bannon for copies of the data for review, but the requests were denied or ignored.
In June 2021, Jack Maxsey, who previously worked as a researcher on Bannon’s podcast “War Room,” delivered a portable hard drive to the post that he said contained data. He said he got it from Giuliani.
The Post commissioned two security experts to examine 217 gigabytes of data on the drive and discovered about 22,000 letters containing cryptographic signatures that could be verified using techniques that would be difficult for even the most sophisticated hackers to forge. I found your email. Much of the data, and most of the approximately 129,000 emails contained therein, could not be verified, according to security experts.
Hunter Biden previously said he wasn’t sure if the laptop belonged to him and didn’t remember dropping it, but admitted he was a serious drug addict and his deep memories were unreliable. His supporters have also suggested that the later published material may have been a mixture of material obtained in various ways.
Friday’s new filing is the latest evidence that Hunter Biden has adopted a new legal strategy after years of silence about the laptop and the content it allegedly contains. A month ago, he hired Abby Lowell, an attorney known for his draconian tactics, and earlier this year, Lowell sent a series of blistering letters to state and federal prosecutors to access and disseminate his personal data. urged a criminal investigation into His team also sent another letter threatening Fox News host Tucker Carlson with a defamation lawsuit.
The higher-profile strategy isn’t endorsed by everyone in Hunter Biden’s orbit. is clarified.
In a separate letter on Friday, Lowell informed the judge that Hunter Biden’s attorneys wanted to meet as soon as possible to discuss the discovery phase of the case, during which they asked for documents. Hunter Biden’s team plans to demand depositions from Mac Isaac “as soon as possible,” and also plans to seek testimony from various other people involved in the matter. said.
They include Bannon, Giuliani and Maxxie. The attorney is also seeking testimony from conservative activist Garrett M. Ziegler, who uploaded some of the data in his possession, and psychiatrist Keith Abloh, whom Hunter Biden sought treatment for.
Abloh, who was close to Republican activist Roger Stone, had one of Hunter Biden’s laptops in his Massachusetts office. That laptop was seized by agents who raided Abloh’s office in February 2020 and was eventually returned to Biden. Some of Hunter Biden’s close associates have theorized that the laptop may have been the basis for hard drives later distributed by Trump’s allies.
[ad_2]
Source link