[ad_1]
(CNN) Two candidates vying for a seat on the Supreme Court of Wisconsin clashed in the only debate on Tuesday over the state’s 1849 abortion ban, potentially settling the issue in one of the nation’s most battleground states. The danger of sexual elections was emphasized.
In an election to determine the balance of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, Milwaukee County Judge Janet Protashewitz will face conservative and liberal opposition former Justice Daniel Kelly. In states where control is divided between Democratic governors and Republican-dominated legislatures, superior courts can decide the outcome of legal battles over state abortion laws, legislative maps, and more.
The only scheduled debate between Protasiewicz and Kelly took place on the same day Wisconsin voters opened direct early voting.
With two weeks left in the campaign, it is on record the most expensive judicial contest in the country, with about $30 million already spent on advertising and tallying. Wisconsin is one of 14 states in the country that directly elect Supreme Court justices in this way.
Protasiewicz focuses on Kelley’s attack on abortion, and nearly all of the state’s 1849 abortion bans are now being contested in court and will likely land in the state’s Supreme Court.
“I can say with 100% certainty that if my opponent is elected, the 1849 ban on abortion will remain in place,” Protashevich said at Tuesday’s debate.
She said she made “no promises” about how the Abortion Act of 1849 would rule. However, she has also expressed her personal support for abortion rights and her support from abortion rights groups. And she noted Kelly’s support for Wisconsin’s Right to Life, which opposes abortion rights.
Kelly countered that Protasiewicz’s comments were “absolutely not true”.
“You don’t know what I think about that abortion ban,” he said. “You don’t know. You don’t know these things.”
The debate took place before a crowd of about 100 seated in the auditorium of the Wisconsin Bar Association’s offices in Madison. As the audience watched in silence, the candidate answered questions from his panel of three reporters from Wisconsin.
The rhetoric became increasingly bitter and acrimonious, especially on the topics of abortion, restructuring and criminal sentencing, with the two rivals standing feet apart on a small stage. The difference that was televised came alive.
Looking directly at her opponent, Kelly repeatedly asked sharp questions about her integrity, at one point stating: He called her by her first name Janet, not by her Judge.
Protasiewic only turned her face to her challengers occasionally, but refuted claims that she was vulnerable to crime.
Kelly accused Protashevich of handing out light sentences to violent criminals.
He cited the case of Anton Beasley, who was convicted in 2021 of child seduction and third-degree sexual assault and was released with a five-year sentence and four years of probation. in prison.
“We look at the sentences she created and the reasons she used to reach those conclusions. It would be irresponsible to allow it to be easily reverted without any effort,” Kelly said.
Protasiewicz admits that “hindsight is 20/20.” But she said Kelly misunderstood her record.
“I have sentenced thousands of people, and what is interesting is that only a handful of cases have been hand-picked, picked, twisted, and insufficient facts provided to voters,” she said. said.
[ad_2]
Source link
