[ad_1]
Users are encountering AI-generated songs by non-existent artists. Many of which are actively promoted by the platform’s algorithms.
One day, Adam Faze was listening to Spotify radio and noticed the same song playing over and over, even though he skipped it. It was annoying, but he shrugged. At least, “Isabelle Morninglocks,” “The Brave Android,” “Crash Tortoise,” etc., until you realize that every time you come across a track, it’s listed under a different artist with a different title. ‘, ‘Queezpoor’, or ‘Viper Beelzebub’.all these songs, or songwas released between now and August of last year and used generic stock images as album art. Pictures of people crowding around a computer, his AI-generated man smoking a cigar, pictures of a meadow with a cloudless sky. Worst part? “It’s a song that shouldn’t have existed in the first place,” Faiz sighs. “that is terrible song. “
Faze compiled all 50 or so versions into one playlist and turned to the internet for answers. “I’m going crazy. Tell me the AI made this song and didn’t release it 100 times twitter thread.
He is not the only one to have experienced this. Recently, a music writer named Jaime Brooks had one of his songs recommended on Spotify. This is his 46 second instrumental song by a musician named Jaime Brooks. “It would be misleading to describe this work as music,” Brooks (the real work) wrote in Substack, comparing its sound to the sounds of many violin performances chopped up and randomly rearranged. doing. Yet, despite releasing songs that are essentially unlistenable, her musical alter ego manages to attract nearly 700 listeners each month. ‘ The most discerning users of the platform.
Such playlists are becoming more and more popular in the age of streaming. payment In order to consume specific content, users tend to turn to existing playlists to create soundtracks for many activities in their daily lives. For example, sessions where users listen to pre-curated playlists make up the majority of streams on Amazon Music, and overall mood music is one of the fastest growing segments in the industry. is.
“It has been said that the proliferation of AI tools will democratize the music industry, but if the number of fake artists on Spotify is any indication, so too could an algorithm-optimized quagmire inundate. .”
Today’s increasingly passive viewers (many of whom may be eating, exercising, or even sleeping while listening to pre-curated playlists) understand that these scams It helps explain how it appears. In a relatively nonsensical fashion, “artists” like Jaime Brooks trick algorithms into releasing real composers’ works while bypassing copyright filters designed to block infringement of existing works. You can provide your work with “I feel like the whole internet is going to become a dumping ground very soon,” says Faze dejectedly. “I, Is this music dropshipping?“
The impact of AI on the music industry has already been hotly debated this week, going viral after Universal Music Group urged Spotify to block the AI company from training its programs with copyrighted works. Deepfakes have been removed from the streaming platform. .[This] Be it the side of artists, fans, human creative expression, or the side of deepfakes, fraud, and denial of just compensation to artists, the question of which side of history all stakeholders in the music ecosystem want to be on. Throw in,” said the spokesperson, an industry giant who counts Drake among many contracted artists.
But, as it turns out, UMG has another horse in this competition: they may not be releasing fake tracks by popular artists, but it’s been a “fake artist” over the years. It’s one of the many major labels and streaming platforms that are said to have filled their playlists. Many of them are paid a certain fee to compose a song, then listed by some artist’s name, with Spotify pocketing the full amount. As of this writing, UMG and Spotify have not responded to requests for comment. The former has previously denied allegations of putting fake artists in its playlists, but that doesn’t explain why so many of the “chill vibes” they curate have become so popular. That’s why they appear to be created by pseudonymous musicians with no digital footprint, or are actively promoted to users like Faze.
The proliferation of AI tools is said to democratize the music industry, but if the plethora of fake artists on Spotify is any indication, similarly algorithm-optimized slashes are flooding the web, causing users to ditch the web. Accessing the site can be difficult. The kind of art they value. Do streaming platforms have a responsibility to tell how songs are made? Should we pay more attention to
[ad_2]
Source link
