[ad_1]
Washington (CNN) A Missouri state judge on Wednesday temporarily blocked the state’s restrictions on gender-affirming care for minors and adults in the state, putting it on hold just hours before it went into effect.
In a brief order from St. Louis County Circuit Court Judge Ellen Ribaudo, the court is essentially asking more to consider whether emergency relief should be issued in a lawsuit seeking to override the restriction. I gained the time of
Rivaldo said he would have a decision on plaintiffs’ motions for a temporary injunction by next Monday and wanted more time to consider a brief submitted by Republican Attorney General Andrew Bailey that issued the new restrictions. Stated.
“The Attorney General has not yet filed a notice of opposition that the Court would like to consider,” the order read.
The restrictions were set to go into effect on Thursday, but Rivaldo’s order, for now, said some of the country’s most sweeping restrictions on gender-affirming care would be suspended for at least a few days. means.
“I’m glad the court is taking this seriously. I hope the rule will be stayed after she considers all the evidence in front of her.”
Gender-affirming care is medically necessary, evidence-based care that uses an interdisciplinary approach to identify the sex assigned (assigned at birth) to the gender affirmed Assist in transitioning to desired gender. Are known.
Bailey issued an “emergency rule” earlier this month that said people often do “life-changing interventions” such as puberty suppression and sex reassignment surgery “without any talk therapy at all,” and that emergency action is “for a reason.” It is necessary for the sake of The Government’s Concerns and Needs to Protect the Public Health, Safety, and Well-Being of Missourians”.
Among other provisions, the rule does not require individuals or health care providers to verify that a patient has “demonstrated medically documented long-term sexual , says it is “illegal” to provide gender-affirming care. , a persistent and intense pattern of gender identity disorder. “
If allowed to take effect, the rule will expire on February 6, 2024, according to a release from Bailey’s office.
Bailey’s office spokesperson Madeleine Thielen said in a statement, “This order simply maintains enforcement of our rules so that the court can consider briefings.
The lawsuit was filed Monday with a transgender adult in the state, two transgender youth, a center in St. Louis that provides treatment for gender dysphoria, and a city center that “provides support for individualized treatment and gender care needs.” filed by a social worker in court documents.
Attorneys for plaintiffs argued that Bailey’s reliance on state consumer protection laws to issue the emergency rule exceeded its authority and did not adequately follow the state’s rulemaking process.
“The Emergency Regulations are an inappropriate and outrageous overreach by unelected political appointees and are intended to distort and weaponize the MMPA. sold and hardware stores blank for determining medical care available to adults in Missouri,” they wrote in court documents.
“A temporary injunction that maintains the status quo, preserves the effectiveness of the Emergency Rule, and prohibits the Attorney General from enforcing it, provides Missourians, including certain plaintiffs, with the limits and the irrevocable consequences of the restrictions. It is necessary to protect against harm that is not necessary to deny clinically appropriate and medically necessary health care and to protect their rights and interests under Missouri law,” they told the court. rice field.
The Attorney General’s Office said Monday that the rule “is based on dozens of scientific studies and reports cited at the end.”
In pushing for measures for minors, legislators have long argued that young people should wait until they reach adulthood before making decisions about such care. The sect’s long-term goal is to ban care for everyone regardless of age, and earlier this year several bills seeking to limit care for adults were introduced in state capitols across the country. I am emphasizing that point.
In some rare cases, Republicans have split with the party on the issue.In Missouri, the Republican secretary of state disagrees with the decision to extend Bailey’s restrictions to adults, but the minors’ restrictions said to support the
“In our country, adults have the right to decide for themselves what they do with their money. If you want to or you’re different, that’s good,” John Ashcroft told CNN’s Bianna Gorodriga on Tuesday in “Reed.”
“But if there’s someone who’s grown up, they can make their own decisions about what they want to do. I support that,” he added.
[ad_2]
Source link
