[ad_1]
Washington (CNN) The chairs of three House committees sent letters to the Manhattan District Attorney on Saturday leading the investigation into Donald Trump, redoubled efforts to intervene in hush-money investigations ahead of possible criminal charges against the former president. .
A letter from the chairman of the House Judiciary, Oversight, and Executive Committees to Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg pushes back on his insistence on appearing in transcribed interviews with the committees, prompting Congress to take legislative action. Three separate issues were to “remove former and/or current presidents from politically motivated prosecutions by state and local authorities.” to protect.”
The letter, written by Republicans Jim Jordan, James Comer and Brian Steil, called on Bragg to testify before the commission earlier this week, calling Bragg’s investigation into Trump an “unprecedented abuse of prosecutors.” issued after criticizing
Bragg plans to pay adult film star Stormy Daniels ahead of the 2016 presidential election, allegedly playing a role in keeping Trump quiet about his alleged relationship with Trump a decade ago. Trump has denied having an affair with Daniels.
Bragg’s general counsel responded Thursday, telling House committee leaders that there was no “legitimate basis for a congressional investigation,” and their request for information was “an indication that Donald Trump will be arrested the next day.” It was only done after creating the false expectation that His lawyers reportedly urged you to intervene. ”
In Saturday’s letter, the chairman insisted Mr Bragg did not challenge “the central allegations at issue” and that his office was closed under “political pressure from left-wing activists and former prosecutors”. “We are planning to use what is alleged to be a violation of federal campaign finance laws,” he said. Federal prosecutors have extended the statute of limitations for an otherwise misdemeanor, vetoing it as a means to prosecute a former U.S. president for the first time in history. ”
They argued that the possibility of criminal prosecution of the former president and 2024 presidential candidate “represents substantial federal benefits, especially in jurisdictions where judicial-level judges are also commonly elected.”
Jordan, Comer, and Still wrote that they could choose to consider three areas of legislation, including the expansion of “preemption provisions in federal election campaign laws,” and that such measures could lead to “better results.” can lead to ,” he added. Clarify the prosecutorial authority of federal and local officials in this area and prevent selective or politicized enforcement of campaign finance restrictions related to federal elections by state and local prosecutors.”
The second bill they may consider would be about tying federal funds to improved indicators of the Public Safety Fund, which alleges the Manhattan Attorney’s Office is using the Public Safety Fund to investigate Mr. Trump. They say it is facilitated by
They also said they might review the special counsel’s powers and consider measures to make ties with other prosecutors more explicit, adding that the status of Trump’s investigation “partially It is due to an investigation by the government,” he said.
CNN’s Jeremy Herb, Kara Scannell, and Paula Reid contributed to this report.
[ad_2]
Source link
