[ad_1]
opinion
April 16, 2023 | 8:03 PM
Twitter CEO Elon Musk was interviewed by BBC reporter James Clayton about Twitter censorship and hate speech.
BBC
Imagine a profession full of ideologically stupid people who lack curiosity and are fueled by snobs.
They’re among the most educated in the world, with degrees from top universities, but many make their careers out of being useful idiots.
They are selfishly convinced that they know nothing and are not good at self-awareness, so they are willfully oblivious to their pretentiousness.
Let’s say these people are the ones relying on information and true stories surrounding serious events.
The status quo of journalism, once seen as a profession full of noble individuals, is now celebrated for being as likable as herpes and as mediocre as “Nepo’s baby.” It is overly composed of people who expect it.
As Twitter owner Elon Musk revealed in an interview with BBC reporter James Clayton, this mainstream media journalist’s current profile is not just an American problem, but an international one.
The two embarked on the topic of censorship and hate speech on Twitter, with Clayton calling back controversial figures Musk had previously banned, accusing a former Twitter employee of lacking moderation in “hate speech.” I pointed out that I blamed the platform.
“What hate speech are you talking about?” Musk asked quickly. “I mean, you’re on Twitter. Is there more hate speech? Just a personal anecdote? I don’t.”
The CEO asked Clayton to provide one instance of hate speech he had seen since Musk took office, but Clayton was unable to provide it.
“I can’t give you one example of hateful content. I can’t give you one tweet. Yet you claimed there was a lot of hateful content. That’s a lie, you just lied. ” Musk said impatiently.
“No, I claimed there were a lot of organizations saying that kind of information was on the rise,” Clayton groped.
“Strategic Dialogue Institute [Institute for Strategic Dialogue] That’s what they would say in England.”
Mr. Musk continued to argue. That’s ridiculous!
He later added that he relied more on the judgment of users than on journalists’ supposed expertise, and that community notes provided more context and were effective in correcting real-world misinformation. made Clayton admit that the BBC had spread false information.
Journalists like Clayton repeat what they hear rather than question what they are told, especially when the source is a person or organization representing a high-society perspective.
All Clayton needed to hear was the Strategic Dialogue Institute’s claim that hate speech was on the rise, and he stood by it.
Any curious journalist can ask the right questions about sources and find out that they are funded by governments around the world, including the United States, and by the richest people in the world, like Bill and Melinda Gates. If you do, you’ll be skeptical.
Musk provided internal communications access to real journalists such as Bari Weiss, Matt Taibbi, and Michael Shellenberger, exposing collusion between the US federal government and Twitter 1.0. This was due to their involvement in organized state-sanctioned censorship. Informative idiots like Clayton reiterate the story of what seems to be an increase in hate speech since the Mask takeover.
Coincidentally or not, the Twitter files revealed the media’s laziness in repeating narratives set by think tanks like Hamilton 68. Hamilton 68 collected accounts of a small number of real Americans, described their genuine conversations as a Russian conspiracy, and perpetuated and weaponized the story of the Russian boogeyman. The term “Russian disinformation” for political purposes.
Journalism has been compromised in part because its practitioners have relentlessly loved to be next to power, not against it.
Journalists of the past understood that it was their job to question the most powerful people in the world, but now I can’t wait to sit next to them at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner .
Every journalist should fight for free speech and not encourage the government to undermine the First Amendment to the US Constitution. If we accept the rationalization of governments to censor people we don’t like, how do we prevent them from censoring the rest of us, including journalists?
The problem is that many of our journalists are actually statisticians, repeating CIA and FBI points, keeping them safe, employed and, most importantly, connected to power. is.
When Musk ended the agency’s control over the public’s speech, mainstream media spokesmen ordered the Fed’s nefarious activities to be downplayed.
Instead of denouncing the state’s excesses, they turned their cameras, pens and keyboards to whistleblower Elon Musk.
Journalism can be revived only when the love relationship close to power ends and a new relationship with curiosity begins.
Adam B. Coleman is the author of “Black Victim to Black Victor” and founder of Wrong Speak Publishing. Follow him on Substack: adambcoleman.substack.com.
load more…
#isDisplay
/isDisplay#isAniviewVideo
/isAniviewVideo#isSRVideo
/isSR video
[ad_2]
Source link