[ad_1]
(CNN) Rights groups sued the Missouri Attorney General on Monday after the Missouri Attorney General announced an “emergency rule” limiting care for transgender minors and adults.
Gender-affirming care is medically necessary, evidence-based care that uses an interdisciplinary approach to identify the sex assigned (assigned at birth) to the gender affirmed Assist in transitioning to desired gender. Are known.
The new rule said that “life-changing interventions” such as puberty suppression and sex reassignment surgery would often be done “without any talk therapy” and that emergency action would be “due to strong government interest and need for protection.” necessary,” he argues. Public Health, Safety, and Welfare of Missourians.”
Among other provisions, the rule requires individuals or health care providers to verify that a patient has “demonstrated medically documented long-term sexual , says it is “illegal” to provide gender-affirming care. , a persistent and intense pattern of gender identity disorder. ”
The rule will take effect Thursday and is scheduled to expire on February 6, 2024, according to a release from the office of Attorney General Andrew Bailey.
According to a petition filed by an advocacy group representing Southampton, the petitioner asked the St. Louis County Circuit Court, in addition to other legal arguments, “because the Attorney General has no statutory authority to promulgate it.” , sued to suspend the rule, seeking to declare it void. St. Louis Community Health Care and multiple health care providers and patients.
“The rule targets gender-affirming care with unprecedented and unique restrictions that effectively prohibit the provision of this necessary, safe, and effective care for most, if not most, transgender people in Missouri. Yes,” the petition said.
The lawsuit also seeks to stay the rule’s scheduled Thursday start date and to award reasonable fees and costs, as well as relief the court deems just and appropriate, the petition said. has said.
CNN reached out to Bailey’s office for comment.
The Attorney General’s Office said Monday that the rule “is based on dozens of scientific studies and reports cited at the end.”
An organization focused on transgender health issues, the World Association of Transgender Health Professionals, and one of its affiliates, the American Association of Transgender Health Professionals, stated that some of the rules were “flawed reporting. It is said that it is based on.
“Emergency Regulations issued by Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey are based on manipulated statistics, flawed reports, and incomplete data, preventing the provision of medically necessary care.” The association responded to an earlier announcement from Bailey’s office last month, stating upcoming regulations.
According to a petition filed Monday, one of the plaintiffs, a transgender patient at Southampton Community Health Care, “will be denied continued hormone therapy if she shares symptoms of other mental health problems. I have expressed to the provider that I am afraid that
Dr Samuel Toktrop, of Southampton Community Health Care, said: “Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey’s emergency order is a baseless and discriminatory attempt to limit health care options for transgender people. People already face several barriers to accessing the life-saving medical care they need. It’s a privilege.”
The president and CEO of LGBTQ advocacy group GLAAD called the measure “an unprecedented attempt to limit the group as a whole.”
“Rules issued by the Missouri Attorney General contain blatant lies and falsehoods about the best treatments supported by all major medical associations,” Sarah Kate Ellis said in a news release. This is an unprecedented attempt to limit an entire group of people from making informed medical decisions to live and thrive.”
“Healthcare decisions must be made between patients, their doctors, and their loved ones, not subject to the whims of overzealous politicians trying to score political points.” Mr Ellis said. “GLAAD is sending all our support to our Missouri organizational partners and activists who are working hard to rescind this unconstitutional directive as soon as possible. It won’t work.”
The action in Missouri comes after North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgham signed a bill this week banning gender-affirming care for most minors, and medical professionals who provide it face felony charges. Indiana and Idaho enacted laws this month banning their own gender-affirming care for young people, and several other states have made gender-affirming efforts for minors in the past few years. I signed a law limiting the care I take.
CNN’s David Close contributed to this report.
[ad_2]
Source link
